chapter 31

This is another chapter that I feel took the most negative approach to a theory as well as what I would consider a closed-minded approach. This is not to say that they have something against postmodernism per se, but rather the chapter still manages to condescend and somewhat look down upon postmodern elements such as punk and fragmented style in architecture. Changes in style are good, they help us progress and make good use of our advances in technology. You can't say that people could have always done what we do now because we were never previously capable of most of what we're doing today.